Online dating hasty generalization
By addressing what I take to be misinterpretations of my work I hope to lower the chance of other people making the same mistakes.Argumentics begins by claiming that there is “no single difference between your example of “Inductive Argument” and that of “Inductive Fallacy”.No, they blame the whole genre for one or a handful of bad experiences. Not only does the negativity make you feel kind of icky when you’re trying to stay hopeful, it turns off the very people who could benefit from online dating.
So the next time you hear someone say, “Have I got a story for you? Or excuse yourself and go seek out the people who have success stories. As online dating becomes more widespread, there’s a good chance you’ll hear something along these lines: “Oh, Bob sent me an email telling me I had the prettiest eyes.
I am willing to admit that this is a reasonable point of concern and is, in fact, one my students raise: how do we distinguish between a fallacy and someone merely saying things that sort of look like a fallacy (the same applies to non-fallacious arguments)? It is a PDF book containing definitions and examples of 42 common fallacies. For Kindle fans, it is also available for 99 cents (or the equivalent in other countries) in the US, the UK and elsewhere.
Perhaps the best (and meanest) use was suggested by a friend of mine: email the file to someone with the subject “You really need this.” This could lead to a discussion on the ethics of using a philosophy book in an act of cruelty.
After all, affirming the consequent is an invalid argument but is not classified as an inductive argument.
While inductive arguments are all technically invalid (since an inductive argument can have all true premises and a false conclusion at the same time), they are not intended to be valid and are assessed by different standards.
When I found that the comment had been deleted, I was somewhat split in my view.